In an era where technology can replicate a person's voice or likeness with unnerving accuracy, legendary Bollywood singer Kumar Sanu is taking a stand. He has approached the Delhi High Court to protect his most valuable assets—his name, image, and iconic voice—from being misused in the digital world, particularly by artificial intelligence.This makes him the latest in a growing line of Indian celebrities, including Amitabh Bachchan and Anil Kapoor, who are drawing a legal line to safeguard their "personality rights."What Is He Asking the Court to Do?At the core of Kumar Sanu's petition is a plea to stop the unauthorized commercial exploitation of his identity. This isn't just about mimicry artists; the lawsuit targets the sophisticated ways his persona is being used for profit without his permission.His key demands include stopping the use of:AI Voice Cloning: A major concern is the use of artificial intelligence to clone his distinctive singing voice. This technology allows others to create new songs or audio clips in his voice without his ever stepping into a recording studio.Digital Likeness: The petition seeks to prevent the unauthorized use of his photographs, digital caricatures, and look-alikes.Memes, GIFs, and Videos: He is also asking for protection against his voice and performances being used in social media content like GIFs and memes, arguing that this can subject him to ridicule and damage his reputation.Unauthorized Merchandise: The suit also aims to halt the creation and sale of any products that use his likeness without consent.The argument is simple: when this content is uploaded to platforms like YouTube and Instagram, it generates revenue for the creators through views and advertisements. They are essentially cashing in on his hard-earned fame and identity.What Are "Personality Rights"?While India doesn't have a specific law spelling out "personality rights," courts have increasingly recognized their importance. It’s a concept that blends the fundamental right to privacy with the right of an individual to control how their identity is used commercially (often called the "right of publicity").Simply put, a public figure has the right to decide how their name, voice, signature, and other unique traits are used, especially for making money.Why This Case Matters Now More Than EverThe Delhi High Court has recently become a crucial protector of these rights. It granted a sweeping order to Amitabh Bachchan to prevent the misuse of his famous voice and image and similarly protected Anil Kapoor's iconic "Jhakaas" catchphrase.Kumar Sanu's case is particularly significant because it squarely confronts the threat of modern AI. The ability to perfectly replicate a singer’s voice is no longer science fiction. This lawsuit could set a vital legal precedent for all artists in the digital age, helping to define the boundaries of identity ownership and ensuring that a voice as beloved as Kumar Sanu's truly remains his own.
Around the web
